Participants’ responses

Tiazhkiy Igor Alekseevich
«AIC Nastashka»

I liked conference very much. I’m just delighted. Highlighted questions were interesting and topical. Lecturers were professional and interesting too. I want to mention highly trained organization of the Congress.

Hvostov Vladimir Viktorovich
«Agroproduct LTD»

My impressions are excellent. The Congress highlighted the vital issue for all agrarians. Among the most topical questions I’d mention the ones about land reform, highlighted by Andrei Martyn, and about raiding by Nikolai Orlov. Also interesting and useful for our business were analytical and technological sections. In the lattest I’d mention Aleksei Serhiyenko with report on soil fertility and Dmitriy Shkorupeyev with report on crop storage.

Semenenko Sergey
«Istok-S»

The Congress left a positive impression. Unfortunately, according to forecasts, prospects for agriculture in Ukraine are disappointing. Most topical and most interesting were reports about the land market and price analysis. Among the lecturers I would like to mention K. Bikert, M. Kolesnik, O. Polivodskyi. Next year I’ll definitely visit the congress again!

Sergienko Dennis
«Alfa Bank»

The Congress is excellent. I liked the report in the section of technologies. I would like to note the presentation of Aleksei Serhiyenko from «Myronivskyi hliboproduct». He shoved specific examples and calculations. Also I’d like to mention Aleksander Myrnyi from «Ahros Vista». His report on the development of medium agribusiness is actually relevant to the present days in Ukraine. Also I took a lot of useful information from the report of M. Orlov about raiding. A. Martyn helped to understand what will be happen with the land market next year.

Sviri Tamara
«Kyiv-Ukraine Atlantic»

Personally I liked the dynamics of the Congress and the young creative team, «Dykun Global Consult». The organization is excellent. Nice to know that in Ukraine such events are conducted.

Piznyak Yuri
«Agricultural firm «Zoria»

The Congress was organized at high level. Highlighted questions were professional, available and topical to the agrarians. Among the lecturers I noted: I. Burakovskyi, M. Vernitskyi, M. Kolesnik, K. Bikert, D. Shkorupeev, Y. Pariy, A. Myrnyi, A. Martyn, A. Koshil, M. Orlov, A. Voloshyna, A. Polivodskyi.
I don’t agree with the opinion of A. Sergienko about the improvement of soil fertility. I’m sure that plowing, which they use, is rather bad to the land condition. I think everyone present at the congress has their own technology tillage.
The report of O. Sen, the Deputy Minister of agriculture, was a failure as all the work of the Ministry in general, headed by the Minister. But his presence at the Congress was important for the participants to ask questions and evaluate the work of the Ministry.
During next Congress give more time for questions and discussion.
In general, I’m satisfied with the Congress. I received the information that enables me to focus on economic trends for next year. This, in turn, will have positive results for the development of my business.